Format

T01P03. Advancing the Comparative Study of The Multiple Streams Framework

Policy Process
PANEL CHAIR(S)
Nikolaos Zahariadis
Rhodes College
Main chair
Annemieke van den Dool
Duke Kunshan University
Second chair
Evangelia Petridou
NTNU Social Research and Mid Sweden University
Third chair
CATEGORISATION
POLICY TOPIC
Policy Process
SECTOR
—
KEYWORDS
—
GENERAL OBJECTIVES, RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND SCIENTIFIC RELEVANCE

General Objective: The panel seeks papers that advance the conceptualization of the Multiple Streams Framework (MSF), or its particular elements (streams, policy window, policy entrepreneurs) by applying it to different fields, scopes, and settings (e.g., subnational, national, or supranational) and by using diverse methodologies (quantitative, qualitative or mixed-methods designs). More specifically, the panel aims to:
 
1.     Develop communities and provide networking opportunities for scholars sharing the MSF as common theoretical orientation.
2.     Encourage dialogue among policy process theoretical orientations within a single conference setting.
3.     Solicit contributions that conceptualize or apply MSF elements on their own as part of additional theoretical orientations to promote the generation of new research agendas.
 
Research Questions: How is policy made under conditions of ambiguity?
 
Scientific Relevance: The panel’s objectives address the essence of the study of public policy. The MSF has emerged as a major framework which analysts use to explain the policy process. We want to further explore the relevance of its hypotheses, especially in developing countries, nondemocracies, sub-national or supranational settings, in order to ascertain its continued usefulness as a tool of policy analysis.

CALL FOR PAPERS

The panel focuses on papers which aim to advance conceptualization of the Multiple Streams Framework (MSF), or its particular elements (streams, policy window, policy entrepreneurs), by applying it to different fields, scopes, and settings (e.g.,
subnational, national, or supranational) and by using diverse methodologies (quantitative, qualitative or mixed-methods designs). Papers that include sound discussion of their propositions and of relations of MSF to other policy process frameworks are particularly welcome.